Thursday, August 29, 2013

Life of Immigrants on Film


Undocument: Exploring the experiences of immigrants through film

Richard Sudan
Deep Breath 300x150 Undocument: Exploring the experiences of immigrants through filmRecently I went to a screening of two short films dealing with the experiences of immigrants, and the challenges and prejudices they often face. The films made for powerful viewing, and provide a sharp contrast to the right-wing propaganda we usually hear levelled at immigrants from politicians, fringe movements like the EDL, and some in the media.
This is worrying, when we consider that over the last few weeks and months we’ve seen a rise in far-right extremism, both at home and also across Europe – with politicians increasingly feeling the need to pander to them to secure votes.
Therefore, in this context, it’s vital that we dispel myths about immigrants, and understand the crucial role they have played and do play in British society, and counter the supposed ‘facts’ and figures often peddled.
The Interpreter and Deep Breath are two pieces which are part of Undocument, a feature made up of four short films exploring the effects of immigration on those living it. They go a long way in achieving this. The films humanize the central characters – themselves dealing with the many challenges typically faced in a strange land – by reflecting their humanity rather than stigmatizing them.
The Interpreter follows the life of an interpreter working in a London immigration court, who finds himself becoming increasingly involved with a family at the mercy of a system which seems loaded with contempt for them. The indifferent bureaucracy of the world in which Ramzi works is at odds with his principles as a human being. Ramzi’s need to safeguard his livelihood conflicts with his instincts to help the family, leading him to an unavoidable crossroad.
Deep Breath written by Amin Bakhshian, tells the story of a mother and eight-year-old son who are forced to live in awful conditions, under the constant threat of an extortionist criminal who holds their fate in his hands. They have no choice but to endure the situation if they are to have any chance of making it to the UK and to have a better life.
The first two films are an achievement in themselves, but this project, like many other great initiatives needs support to complete the other films and to spread awareness of what is an important and complex issue, one that needs more attention, and certainly more consideration than it is usually afforded.
The reality of the conditions and the humanity of the people facing these hardships are often lost in a muddle of statistics, numbers, and cheap propaganda, as recently seen with theoutrageous tweet and campaign organised by the Home Office.
Kyla Simone Bruce, writer and director of The Interpreter explained why she felt it was important to create these films: “After spending time in immigrations courts and speaking with people who were going through this complex and often difficult process, I was very much affected by my experiences.”
“My intention with The Interpreter was to capture the very real emotions felt by the individuals involved. I didn’t have any specific intentions in terms of pushing any one agenda, just to shed light on the situations that people are going through right here, right now. I wanted to stay honest and truthful to the circumstances and characters and to give a more honest reflection of what is really happening, in contrast to the often generalised viewpoint of the mainstream media.”
For more information visit www.undocumentfilm.com
Tagged in: 

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Immigration Reform's Lost Month



Immigration Reform’s Lost Month

Success on the town hall circuit doesn't mean reform advocates will win in Congress


LUCY NICHOLSON/REUTERS
Maria Cervantes, 6, takes part in a 24-hour vigil calling on Congress to pass immigration reform in Los Angeles, June 27, 2013.


From Time Swampland:
August is almost over, with it ends the discussion over which side in the immigration debate enjoyed the upper hand while Congress was in recess. The verdict was nearly unanimous. It was also mistaken.
Proponents of reform, noted the Washington Post, launched an “all-out push,” pressing a comprehensive overhaul of U.S. immigration law at “roundtables and rallies, sit-ins and voter registration drives, as well as expensive radio and television ads.” Meanwhile, opponents ”have been mostly absent” from public view, wrote The Atlantic,. “Anti-immigration forces have lain low,” Politicagreed. Liberal blogs gleefully circulatedphotos of Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, an icon of the anti-reform movement, speaking to a sparse crowd on the first leg of a “Stop Amnesty” tour. Reform advocates have “prevailed” over the summer break, wrote The New Republic, under a headline that read: “Immigration Reform is Having a Good Month.”
But this assessment misses the forest for the trees.
If you measure success by events held and headlines generated, it’s true that the diverse array of groups who support immigration reform trounced a shrinking and disorganized opposition during the August recess. It also doesn’t matter much. An immigration overhaul like the bill that passed the Senate in June already enjoyed broad support among voters, including a majority of Republicans. The continuing success of the outside game does little to change the lack of momentum inside the Capitol.
There is no timetable for legislative action in the House. Republicans have slow-walked the issue into a brief fall legislative session that will be dominated by another round of budget brinkmanship. The crowded calendar is one reason supporters had hoped the deal would be done by now, knowing the chances of success grow slimmer the longer the debate drags on.
Yes, a few dozen conservatives are open to a path to citizenship. But House Republicans have vowed not to take up the Senate bill, and an alternative proposal in the House never materialized. It seems unlikely a House Republican majority that has been content to let the issue languish will abruptly shift course — especially now that Sen. Marco Rubio and Rep. Raul Labrador, two of the Republicans with the credibility to sell an overhaul to their colleagues, have abandoned their roles as pitchmen.
Advocates were cheered by the dearth of organized opposition to reform because the conservative base has won recess battles in the past. In 2007, the grassroots rebelled at a George W. Bush-backed immigration proposal, and the 2009 recess furies foreshadowed the Republican landslide in the 2010 midterms. But grassroots strength is an imperfect portent of legislative success. Take Obamacare, which passed despite the Tea Party outcry at venomous town halls.
As one progressive involved in the immigration-reform push puts it: “Progressives need to be less confident that field and legislative outcomes are linked — a recurring illusion.” Even if immigration reform managed to “survive“ August, it did so only on life support. 



Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/26/immigration-reforms-lost-month/#ixzz2dH2TUkbB

Saturday, August 10, 2013

99 Year Old Got Green Card


Immigration Direct told this beautiful story of a ninety nine year old woman who got her citizenship.
Iranian Khatoun Khoykani was awarded her green card at the age of 99 after moving to the U.S. 15 years ago, according to the Associated Press. Khoykani was among approximately 3,700 other immigrants who were naturalized during a ceremony in Los Angeles on July 26.
Khoykani was the oldest person this year among the naturalized citizens in L.A. There have only been 27 people older than 100 to become American citizens in the last 50 years, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services told the source.
"I'm shaking because I'm so happy," Khoykani told the AP. "There's no place like this in the entire world."
Khoykani left Iran shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution before settling in L.A. in 1998, the AP reported. Her three children left Iran almost 30 years ago for the U.S. and she came here to be with them.
She returned to Iran in 2008 to care for her sick husband and after he passed away in 2009 she had trouble reentering the U.S. Her daughter tried to pick her up and a "lengthy legal process" began. 
According to the AP, the oldest person ever to become a U.S. citizen was a 117-year-old Turkish immigrant named Manik Bokchalian. She took her oath of allegiance in 1997.

Friday, April 26, 2013

Waiver of Adjustment Interviews


NBC Practice Pointer: Waiver of Adjustment Interviews for Certain Family-Based Petitions

Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 13042251 (posted Apr. 22, 2013)" 
On October 2012, USCIS announced that it was transferring certain filings from the four USCIS service centers to either a field office or the National Benefits Center (NBC) in order to balance the workload and processing times. (AILA Doc. No. 12100148.) As part of this workload shift, USCIS transferred interview-waivable family-based Forms I-485 from the California Service Center (CSC) to the NBC.
Under 8 CFR §245.6, USCIS may waive the interview for an applicant for adjustment of status. The NBC’s decision to waive the interview for certain cases is based on standards set at the national level, and include adjustment categories in which there is normally enough evidence to make a decision without an interview. According to minutes from a November 2012 liaison meeting with the NBC and the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM), the following adjustment applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis for a waiver of the interview (AILA Doc. No. 13011447, AFM Chapter 23.2(h).):
  • Unmarried minor children and stepchildren of U.S. citizens (IR7 and CR7) that are accompanied by original or certified copies of supporting documents;
  • Parents of U.S. citizens (IR0) that are accompanied by original or certified copies of supporting documents;
  • K1/K2 entrants— Fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens and children of Fiancé(e)s (CF1/CF2);
  • Natives/Citizens of Cuba filing under 11/2/66 Act (also spouses/children of such individuals regardless of their citizenship and place of birth) (CU6/CU7);
  • Unmarried & Under 14 year old children of lawful permanent residents (F27);
  • Cases where the applicant has been interviewed in the course of an investigation or field examination, and the adjudicating examiner determines that further interview of the applicant is unnecessary;
  • Cases in which there is sufficient evidence contained in the record to support a denial of the adjustment of status application.
Please note that the NBC will NOT waive the interview for applicants who file:
  • With Supplement A to Form I-485, Adjustment of Status Under Section 245(i)
  • With an EWI class of admission
  • As part of a family packet; unless every application in the family packet meets the interview waiver criteria.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Immigration Reform - One More Week


It seems that immigration reform is delayed for one more week. Hang in there guys! According to Yahoo News:

Today's expected Senate briefing on the gang of eight immigration bill was postponed.
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., was scheduled to explain their nearly finished proposal, but senators coming out of the closed door meeting on Capitol Hill told reporters the gun issue took up the entire agenda.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., a powerful critic ofimmigration reform, said the gang of eight was not ready.
Sessions said, "I guess he wasn't ready. They didn't seem to be interested in doing that," he told reporters. "I didn't get the impression there was any interest to get that done today [among the gang of eight]. The impression I got was that they hoped to be able to do it next week."
Sen. Jeff Flake, a Republican of Arizona and one of the gang of eight, told reporters the bill could be ready by Friday or slip into next week.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Immigration and Children


Article from The Hill Blog:



It’s encouraging to hear Democrats and Republicans talking about children in the immigration debate. Children of immigrants are one-fourth of the kids in America, and one million of America’s unauthorized aspiring citizens are children. So getting immigration reform done means getting it right for kids.
 
This bipartisan focus on kids is critical, because current law subjects children to serious hardship and harm. As Michigan State Law School professor David Thronson recently wrote, today’s immigration law “devalues” children. He concludes that it treats children as objects, instead of people with rights and a say in their own lives. Not surprisingly, when children interact with the system, the outcomes are not good. For example a person inadmissible to the U.S. can qualify for relief by showing hardship to a U.S. citizen spouse or other close adult relative, but the law systematically ignores the same hardship to a U.S. citizen child. Similar double-standards for deportation routinely subject kids to harm, by ignoring the common-sense reality that children experience traumatic separation in more damaging and lasting ways than adults.The consequences are devastating. Recently, over the course of about two years, the federal government deported more than 200,000 parents of U.S. citizen children – that’s 250 parents every day. Each deportation means children’s lives are overturned, as they are forced to either move to a land they’ve never known or face the trauma of losing a parent.
 
An estimated 5,000 children are currently living in our states’ overworked, under-resourced foster care systems due to their parent’s detention or deportation. In many cases, their parents were not abusive or neglectful. These children have been separated from their parents – sometimes permanently – simply because their parents did not go through normal legal channels when they brought their children to the land of freedom, opportunity, and justice.
 
Some policymakers have acknowledged the high stakes for children in immigration reform, responding with a call for passage of the DREAM Act or similar legislation. DREAM, which provides a roadmap to citizenship for some young people brought without authorization to the United States as children, is an important part of any immigration reform solution that works for children. And we welcome the upcoming introduction of a bipartisan DREAM Act in the House of Representatives. But while DREAM is a necessary element, it is by no means sufficient to ensure that reform works for all kids.
 
What America needs is immigration reform that addresses the full range of problems kids face. In partnership with more than 200 national, state, and local organizations, we and the Women’s Refugee Commission recently released a set of principles for immigration reform that meets children’s needs. These partners, representing faith traditions, advocates for civil rights, immigrant families, and children, all agree that Congress must:
 
    1.    Provide a roadmap to citizenship that is direct, clear, affordable, and reasonable;
    2.    Protect  children’s basic rights, including access to public services for children and families;
    3.    Reform enforcement to protect children’s safety and well-being, including protections for the thousands of immigrant children who enter the U.S. each year not accompanied by an adult; and,
    4.    Commit to keeping families together, by modernizing the family-based immigration system, prioritizing children’s interests in immigration law, and adopting family-friendly enforcement policies.
 
We understand that such things are easier said than done. Like the principles released by President Obama and a bipartisan group in the U.S. Senate, moving from broad concepts to specific legislative language will be difficult. But we are committed to working with any policymaker – Democrat or Republican – who is serious about building an immigration system that meets children’s needs.
 
Reform is an urgent priority for kids, because every day we delay means more denials, more deportations, more foster care placements, and more families torn apart. But whether children’s lives are better or worse depends on whether lawmakers make kids a priority or continue to devalue their interests.
 
We urge members of Congress to confront the tragedies children experience every day under current law, and commit to delivering a better immigration law that reflects our nation’s family values and advances our national interest in the success of every child. Because, in the long run, getting immigration reform done means getting it right for kids.
 
Lesley is president of First Focus.



Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Release of Detainees



The New York Times has reported:

Federal immigration officials have released hundreds of detainees from detention centers around the country in recent days in a highly unusual effort to save money as automatic budget cuts loom in Washington, officials said Tuesday.
The government has not dropped the deportation cases against the immigrants, however. The detainees have been freed on supervised release while their cases continue in court, officials said.
But the decision angered many Republicans, including Representative Robert W. Goodlatte of Virginia, who said the releases were a political gambit by the Obama administration that undermined the continuing negotiations over comprehensive immigration reform and jeopardized public safety.
“It’s abhorrent that President Obama is releasing criminals into our communities to promote his political agenda on sequestration,” said Mr. Goodlatte, who, as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, is running the House hearings on immigration reform. “By releasing criminal immigrants onto the streets, the administration is needlessly endangering American lives.”
A spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, an arm of the Department of Homeland Security, said the detainees selected for release were “noncriminals and other low-risk offenders who do not have serious criminal histories.”
Officials said the releases, which began last week and continued on Tuesday, were a response to the possibility of automatic governmentwide budget cuts, known as sequestration, which are scheduled to take effect on Friday.
“As fiscal uncertainty remains over the continuing resolution and possible sequestration, ICE has reviewed its detained population to ensure detention levels stay within ICE’s current budget,” the agency’s spokeswoman, Gillian M. Christensen, said in a statement. The agency’s budget for custody operations in the current fiscal year is $2.05 billion, officials said, and as of Saturday, ICE was holding 30,773 people in its detention system.
Immigration officials said Tuesday that they had no plans to release substantially more detainees this week, though they warned that more releases were still possible depending on the outcome of budget negotiations.
They refused to specify exactly how many detainees were released, or where the releases took place. But immigrants’ advocates around the country have reported that detainees were freed in several places, including Hudson County, N.J.; Polk County, Tex.; Broward County, Fla.; New Orleans; and from centers in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia and New York.
While immigration officials occasionally free detainees on supervised release, immigration advocates said that the surge of recent releases — so many in such a short span of time — was extraordinary.
Under supervised release, defendants in immigration cases have to adhere to a strict reporting schedule that might include attending appointments at a regional immigration office as well as wearing electronic monitoring bracelets, officials said.
Advocacy groups, citing the cost of detaining immigrants, have for years argued that the federal government should make greater use of less expensive alternatives to detention for low-risk defendants being held on administrative charges.
One such group, the National Immigration Forum, estimated last year that it cost from $122 to $164 a day to hold a detainee in the federal immigration system. In contrast, the organization said, alternative forms of detention could cost from 30 cents to $14 a day per immigrant.
Among those released in the past week was Anthony Orlando Williams, 52, a Jamaican immigrant who spent nearly three years in a detention center in Georgia. “I’m good, man,” he said. “I’m free.”
Mr. Williams, in a telephone interview from Stone Mountain, Ga., said he became an illegal immigrant when he overstayed a visa in 1991. He was detained in 2010 by a sheriff’s deputy in Gwinnett County, Ga., when it was discovered that he had violated probation for a conviction in 2005 of simple assault, simple battery and child abuse, charges that sprung from a domestic dispute with his wife at the time. He was transferred to ICE custody and has been fighting a deportation order with the help of Families for Freedom, an immigrant support group in New York.
Jonathan Weisman contributed reporting

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Immigration Reform will pass....



WASHINGTON – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Sunday he is optimistic the Senate will pass immigration legislation, suggesting Republicans will have no choice but to join the push for a sweeping overhaul.
“Things are looking really good,” the Nevada Democrat said in an interview on ABC News’ “This Week.” “Republicans can no longer stop this. They’ve tried it; it hasn’t worked.”
A bipartisan group of senators – four Democrats and four Republicans – last week unveiled a blueprint for comprehensive legislation that would tighten border security and set up a path for illegal immigrants to get citizenship.
And several leading GOP lawmakers have noted that the party, which lost heavily among Latino voters in the 2012 presidential election, must take action on the immigration issue.
But many conservatives, particularly in the House, remain leery of allowing the estimated 11 million immigrants who entered the country illegally to become citizens.
Other issues important to Democrats – such as giving the foreign partners of gay and lesbian Americans a family preference in the immigration system – also remain major partisan stumbling blocks.
Reid brushed that issue aside. “If they’re looking for an excuse not to support this legislation, this is another one, but the American people are past excuses. They want this legislation passed,” he said.
The Senate leader also was bullish on prospects for passing new gun control legislation, another one of President Obama’s top priorities for his second term.
But the veteran lawmaker – who has won the backing in the past from the National Rifle Assn. – would not commit to a key goal of gun control advocates: limits on the size of high-capacity ammunition magazines.
Reid would only say: “I think that's something we definitely have to take a look at.”
Looking ahead to the next round of budget negotiations, the majority leader continued to insist that any more efforts to reduce federal deficits must include new tax revenue.
Republicans, by contrast, are insisting on only spending cuts.
“The American people are on our side,” Reid said. “The American people don’t believe in these austere things. We believe that the rich should contribute. We believe we should fill those tax loopholes, get rid of them, I should say. And that’s where we need to go.”
Twitter: @noamlevey

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Immigration Plan Revealed


January 29, 2013 5:00 pm  •  
LAS VEGAS — President Barack Obama on Tuesday put the weight of his administration behind efforts to pass legislation allowing many of the nation's 11 million illegal immigrants to earn citizenship, seeking to build on a rapidly shifting political consensus around the issue.
Obama dedicated the first trip of his second term to calling for an overhaul of immigration laws, making clear that it is one of his top domestic priorities. The president — who has said that not passing an overhaul in his first term was his biggest failure — also suggested he has little patience for Congress and would demand that lawmakers vote on his more permissive plan if they do not swiftly pass their own.
"Now is the time," Obama said, eliciting chants of "Si, se puede" — roughly translated as "Yes, it's possible" — from the crowd at a majority Hispanic high school here. "We can't allow immigration reform to get bogged down in an endless debate."
Fresh off a decisive re-election, Obama is seizing this moment as one in which both sides could come together to address widespread anxieties within rising demographic groups, particularly Hispanics and Asian Americans.
But obstacles still loomed large Tuesday on Capitol Hill, fueled by continued unease among conservative Republicans over going too far to loosen immigration restrictions. One of the biggest disputes centers on whether illegal immigrants would have to wait to seek a green card — the first step to full citizenship — until the U.S. border with Mexico is secure and other enforcement measures are in place.
A bipartisan Senate plan released Monday would tie the possibility of citizenship to several such enforcement measures, including a system to verify the immigration status of employees. The president did not comment explicitly on that proposal in his speech, but the administration suggested in its own guidelines released Tuesday that it does not want to link the citizenship process to other goals.
"It must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship," Obama said, adding that the administration has made great strides in an effort to toughen enforcement.
Some key Republicans expressed concern with any approach that does not link border security with the proposal to offer illegal immigrants a way to become citizens.
"Without such triggers in place, enforcement systems will never be implemented and we will be back in just a few years dealing with millions of new undocumented people in our country," said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a potential 2016 presidential candidate and one of eight senators who signed on to the bipartisan framework.
Another set of pitfalls awaits in the House, where many Republicans are deeply skeptical of any legislation that they believe might be overly generous to illegal immigrants.
"There are a lot of ideas about how best to fix our broken immigration system," said Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "We hope the president is careful not to drag the debate to the left and ultimately disrupt the difficult work that is ahead in the House and Senate."
The White House had considered releasing its own legislation to overhaul the immigration system, but Obama said he would not immediately do so.
The president and his aides have long worried that by simply endorsing a position, Obama could turn Republicans against a proposal they otherwise might support.
Obama said the Senate framework is "very much in line with the principles I've proposed and campaigned on for the last few years." But — in keeping with the more muscular approach he has taken in other recent debates — Obama also made clear he would not wait long.
"If Congress is unable to move forward in a timely fashion, I will send up a bill based on my proposal and insist that they vote on it right away," he said.
Just a year ago, during a Republican presidential primary season dominated by tough talk on immigration, it seemed implausible that legislation to address the issue could muster support.
But many Republicans have shifted rapidly on the issue since the November election, when Obama won more than 70 percent of votes from Latinos and Asian Americans.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Obama's 2008 opponent, said he was "cautiously optimistic" that the two sides could reach a deal.
"While there are some differences in our approaches to this issue, we share the belief that any reform must recognize America as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants," said McCain, who spearheaded a failed 2007 immigration overhaul effort before emphasizing tough border positions during his 2010 re-election.
The senators have said they want to draft a bill by the end of March and pass it through the Senate by the summer, striking quickly while there is momentum on the issue.
But aides acknowledge there are dozens of questions they must answer before they can come forward with legislation.
For example, what measurements will be used to determine if border security has been improved sufficiently to allow illegal immigrants to pursue full citizenship? How large a fine would be required to get probationary legal residency? How would a temporary-worker program operate?
Under Obama's plan, illegal immigrants seeking citizenship would register, submit biometric data, pass background checks and pay fees before gaining provisional legal status, according to a White House summary.
After taking those steps and learning English, the immigrants would wait in line for existing immigration backlogs to clear before being allowed to apply for permanent resident status, which immigrants must hold before they can apply for citizenship.
Children brought to the United States illegally would be eligible for an expedited process if they go to college or serve in the military for at least two years.
The plan would also allow citizens and permanent residents to seek a visa for a same-sex partner — an idea opposed by many religious groups and one that went unmentioned by Obama in his Tuesday speech.
"It won't be a quick process, but it will be a fair process," Obama said Tuesday in Nevada, which is 27 percent Hispanic.
The president, the son of a Kenyan man and an American woman, also sought to remind the audience of immigration's central role in the nation's history.
"When we talk about that in the abstract, it's easy sometimes for the discussion to take on a feeling of 'us versus them,' " Obama said. "And when that happens, a lot of folks forget that most of 'us' used to be 'them.' "
Obama, who will take his case to the Spanish-language Univision and Telemundo networks on Wednesday, said his principles for immigration reform also include strengthening border security and cracking down more forcefully on businesses that knowingly hire illegal workers.
Immigration advocates reacted enthusiastically.
"The president faced a tough situation on how to encourage the bipartisan process without becoming hostage to it," said Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, an advocacy group. "As someone who has been concerned and hoping he would be aggressive, I though he did strike the right tone."
- - -
Helderman reported from Washington. David Nakamura, Tara Bahrampour and William Branigin in Washington contributed to this report.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

President Obama Will Talk about Immigration Plan

Article from the Associated Press :

President Obama, just days into his second term, is pressing ahead on the explosive issue of immigration reform -- boosted Monday by a bipartisan group of senators drafting a proposal of their own while running into early criticism that the blueprint amounts to "amnesty." 
The president is traveling Tuesday to Las Vegas, where he will outline his immigration reform goals, said to be similar to those he championed during the campaign. The issue was put on the back burner during his first term -- overtaken by debate over health care legislation and economic measures. But along with gun control, it one of the top items on his second-term domestic agenda. 
Eight U.S. senators got ahead of him Monday, unveiling a blueprint that calls for, among other things, a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants already in the United States. 
But White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the president "welcomes" the proposal, saying it represents the "bipartisan support coalescing" behind certain principles of immigration reform. 
"This is an important first step. ... We need to continue the movement," Carney said. 
An Obama administration official tells Fox News the senators' plan is on a trajectory that mirrors Obama’s immigration plan almost exactly, and that the White House is willing to let the group take the lead.
The aide says requiring illegal immigrants to pay back taxes and a fine and ensuring they would be at the back of the line after would-be legal immigrants have always been part of the president's immigration proposal. The president has also advocated for a path to citizenship. 
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., one of the eight senators  called the new proposal a "major breakthrough" and said he hopes to turn it into legislation by March -- with the goal of passing something out of the Senate "by late spring or summer." 
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., standing beside him, claimed 2013 is the "best chance" lawmakers will have to tackle immigration for years. 
Even so, the proposed pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants drew immediate criticism from others on Capitol Hill. 
"No one should be surprised that individuals who have supported amnesty in the past still support amnesty," Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said. "By granting amnesty, the Senate proposal actually compounds the problem by encouraging more illegal immigration." 
The eight senators who unveiled the new principles are Democrats Schumer, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado; and Republicans McCain, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Marco Rubio of Florida and Jeff Flake of Arizona. 
According to documents released early Monday, the senators will call for accomplishing four main goals: 
--Creating a path to citizenship for the estimated illegal immigrants already in the U.S., contingent upon securing the border and better tracking of people here on visas. 
--Reforming the legal immigration system, including awarding green cards to immigrants who obtain advanced degrees in science, math, technology or engineering from an American university. 
--Creating an effective employment verification system to ensure that employers do not hire illegal immigrants. 
--Allowing more low-skill workers into the country and allowing employers to hire immigrants if they can demonstrate they couldn't recruit a U.S. citizen; and establishing an agricultural worker program. 
The principles being released Monday are outlined on just over four pages, leaving plenty of details left to fill in. 
A Senate aide tells Fox News the group's principles say important security triggers must be met before a pathway for citizenship is created for illegal immigrants. Even then, the principles explicitly state that illegal immigrants must go to the back of the line behind would-be legal immigrants, and they will not be eligible for federal benefits while in the temporary legal status. 
The aide tells Fox News that although many of the details of the bill still need to be worked out, those involved are encouraged by their progress and the support of senior senators. Members of the group on Sunday said they are seeking to craft a one-step, all-encompassing bill based on the shared principles. 
"We are committed to a comprehensive approach to immigration that we can live with," Durbin told "Fox News Sunday." 
Citizenship has been a sticking point in previous efforts, particularly among Capitol Hill Republicans. However, they appear willing to accept the path to citizenship, in part, so long as the legislation also includes tighter border security. 
Tennessee Republican Sen. Bob Corker told Fox News he is optimistic but "details matter." 
"We're at the talking points stage," he said. "We need to get to the legislation." 
McCain said more work is needed on the legislation. 
"I'm quietly optimistic we can get it done," he told ABC's "This Week." 
McCain, a key player in the 2007 effort on immigration reform, also acknowledged that Obama's overwhelming support among Hispanics in the November elections was a wakeup call to Republicans that they need to do more to reach out to that growing part of the population. 
The group has been working since the November elections on the legislation and is expected to have a complete bill by March or April. 
Several of these lawmakers have worked for years on the issue. McCain collaborated with the late Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy on comprehensive immigration legislation pushed by then-President George W. Bush in 2007, only to see it collapse in the Senate when it couldn't get enough GOP support. 
Fox News' Mike Emanuel and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/29/bipartisan-group-8-senators-reach-deal-on-immigration-changes/#ixzz2JMQTWrjT

Monday, January 7, 2013

Billions spent on Immigration Enforcement


Article on Yahoo states:

Gov't Spent $18 Billion on Immigration Enforcement

The Obama administration spent more money on immigration enforcement in the last fiscal year than all other federal law enforcement agencies combined, according to a report on the government'senforcement efforts from a Washington think tank.
The report on Monday from the Migration Policy Institute, a non-partisan group focused on global immigration issues, said in the 2012 budget year that ended in September the government spent about $18 billion on immigration enforcement programs run by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the US-Visit program, and Customs and Border Protection, which includes the Border Patrol.Immigration enforcement topped the combined budgets of the FBI; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Drug Enforcement Administration and U.S. Secret Service by about $3.6 billion dollars, the report's authors said.
Since then-President Ronald Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act in 1986 — which legalized more than 3 million illegal immigrants and overhauled immigration laws — the government has spent more than $187 billion on immigration enforcement. According to the report, "Immigration Enforcement in the United States: The Rise of a Formidable Machinery," federal immigration-related criminal prosecutions also outnumber cases generated by the Justice Department.
The 182-page report concludes that the Obama administration has made immigration its highest law enforcement priority. Critics are likely to bristle over its findings, especially those who have accused the administration of being soft on immigration violators.
"Today, immigration enforcement can be seen as the federal government's highest criminal law enforcement priority, judged on the basis of budget allocations, enforcement actions and case volumes," MPI Senior Fellow Doris Meissner, a co-author of the report, said in a statement released with the report Monday.
The report by MPI's Meissner, Muzaffar Chishti, Donald Kerwin and Clair Bergeron, comes amid renewed interest in immigration reform from Congress and the White House.
In the immediate aftermath of the November election, congressional Republicans suggested the time was right to begin reform talks anew. President Barack Obama, who won a record share of Hispanic voters, renewed a previous pledge to make immigration reform a priority.
In the lead up to the election, Obama made several administrative changes to the immigration system, including launching a program to allow some young illegal immigrants to avoid deportation and work legally in the country for up to two years. His administration also refocused enforcement efforts to target criminal immigrants and those who posed a security threat. And just last week, the administration announced a rule change to allow some illegal immigrant spouses and children of U.S. citizens to stay in the country while they ask the government to waive 3- or 10-year bans on returning to the United States. Immigrants who win the waiver will still need to leave the country to complete visa paperwork, but will be able to leave without fear of being barred from returning to their families for up to a decade. The rule, first proposed last year, goes into effect in March.
Republican lawmakers have widely criticized the policy changes, routinely describing them as "backdoor amnesty." Many of those same lawmakers have said the border needs to be secured before reform can be taken up.
According to the MPI report and Border Patrol statistics, in 2011 agents arrested about 327,000 people at the southern border, the fewest in nearly 40 years. The Homeland Security Department also removed a record 396,906 immigrants that year. In 2012, nearly 410,000 people were removed from the United States.
———
Follow Alicia A. Caldwell on Twitter at www.twitter.com/acaldwellap
Also Read